BAPTIST THE ONLY THOROGH RELIGIONS REFORMERS

Services

Worship Service 2:00pm - Bible Study 3:00pm

THE FORGOTTEN HEIRITAGE

Why study, read and learn about Church history? Jude wrote that we are to earnestly contend for the faith once delivered to the saints. We think that because we have the Bible there is no danger that we could stray from the truth of God’s word. How wrong we would be and history proves it. The letters written to the seven churches in Asia (Rev. 2-3) makes it evident that false doctrine had crept in and even corrupted many of there churches before the end of the 1st century.

By the middle of the third century (250AD) the Lord’s churches had fully separated themselves from their brethren who were not following the doctrine of Christ having establishing their own traditions and practices that were not Biblical. By the middle of the 4th century (350AD) these churches had departed from the faith entirely and were married to the state of Rome, that blasphemous and whorish beast that soon became the Holy Roman Catholic Church we know today.

The Lord’s churches had obtained their names from their principle men and the locations they were found. They were first known as Christian (Acts 11:26), and later, Novatians, Donatist, Waldenses, Albigenses, Paterines, Mennonites (not the modern day Menonites), Cathari, ana-baptist and Baptist. All these, though known by different names and living in different ages, all preached faithfully the doctrines of Christ, and accounted by all honest historians as the only church that has kept pure the doctrine of the Apostles, for “*no danger nor any torture could make them deny or dissemble their doctrine which they believed inculcated in the Sacred Scripture.” (*The Western Baptist Review, Vol. IV, Jan. 1845 No.5 found in The History of The Christian Church, Jones, Vol. 1, pg.P38, 1983 reprint by Church History Research and Archives)

The purpose of this page is to give the reader a peek into our Faith, history and persecutions over the last 2000 years.  

Pastor David R Hethorn

by: David Hethorn

04/02/2021

0

All professed Christians, who admit that the Scriptures contain a model for church organization,  strenuously maintain that the denomination with which they are connected is formed after the scriptural pattern . This is true alike of Episco-palians, Presbyterians, Methodists, and others.
But it is abundantly evident, that while these denominations are so very dissimilar, they cannot all resemble one scriptural model. It is further evident, that some who make pretensions to be " the church ,” are not satisfied to rest their claim to that title, simply on a comparison of their or ganization with the New Testament pattern of a gospel church , but very gladly seek to bring in evidence from other quarters, by which they hope to support their cause. Jewish antiquity, the Fathers, Tradition, Expediency, are all pressed into their service, to supply the lack of evidence afforded in Scripture ; or, as is sometimes the case; to nullify and render powerless its direct testimony against them . All this, I say , is done by those who profess to find, in the New Testament alone, a warrant for their ecclesiastical sys- tems and organizations. They do not seem to perceive, that the very course which they adopt to support their claims, affords most conclusive evidence that they are false and vain.

But while some appeal to Tradition, and others to expediency, it is the glory of the Baptists that they act on the principle of the sufficiency of the Bible in testing this, as well as all other questions relating to religion.
BAPTIST THE ONLY THOROGH RELIGIONS REFORMERS, John Q. Adams, 1854, pg. 126, 127.


All professed Christians, who admit that the Scriptures contain a model for church organization,  strenuously maintain that the denomination with which they are connected is formed after the scriptural pattern . This is true alike of Episco-palians, Presbyterians, Methodists, and others.
But it is abundantly evident, that while these denominations are so very dissimilar, they cannot all resemble one scriptural model. It is further evident, that some who make pretensions to be " the church ,” are not satisfied to rest their claim to that title, simply on a comparison of their or ganization with the New Testament pattern of a gospel church , but very gladly seek to bring in evidence from other quarters, by which they hope to support their cause. Jewish antiquity, the Fathers, Tradition, Expediency, are all pressed into their service, to supply the lack of evidence afforded in Scripture ; or, as is sometimes the case; to nullify and render powerless its direct testimony against them . All this, I say , is done by those who profess to find, in the New Testament alone, a warrant for their ecclesiastical sys- tems and organizations. They do not seem to perceive, that the very course which they adopt to support their claims, affords most conclusive evidence that they are false and vain.

But while some appeal to Tradition, and others to expediency, it is the glory of the Baptists that they act on the principle of the sufficiency of the Bible in testing this, as well as all other questions relating to religion.
BAPTIST THE ONLY THOROGH RELIGIONS REFORMERS, John Q. Adams, 1854, pg. 126, 127.


cancel save

0 Comments on this post:

G-S2C1WD47PE